KyberSwap Elastic (Polygon) Review: Security Risks & Pros/Cons in 2026

In November 2023, the KyberSwap Elastic platform suffered a major security exploit that cost users over $56 million. This incident wasn't just a minor glitch-it shattered trust in one of the industry's most innovative decentralized exchanges. Today, we're diving into what KyberSwap Elastic actually is, how it works, and whether it's safe to use in 2026. This review cuts through the hype to give you clear facts about its strengths, weaknesses, and real-world impact.

What is KyberSwap Elastic?

KyberSwap Elastic is a decentralized exchange protocol operating on the Polygon blockchain network. Launched in 2022, it's an upgraded version of KyberDMM (now called KyberSwap Classic), built by co-founders Loi Luu and Victor Tran. Luu holds a PhD in Computer Science from the National University of Singapore and worked at the Ethereum Foundation from 2016-2017. Tran brings expertise as a senior backend engineer with a B.S. in Computer Science from Vietnam National University. Unlike traditional constant product AMMs, KyberSwap Elastic uses a tick-based system that allows liquidity providers to concentrate their assets within specific price ranges.

This approach maximizes capital efficiency but introduces complexity. The platform currently supports 3 coins across 4 trading pairs on Polygon, with an average bid-ask spread of 0.882%. It ranks in the 48th percentile for volume but hits the 2nd percentile in orderbook depth-showing strong liquidity for its size.

How KyberSwap Elastic Works

At its core, KyberSwap Elastic uses concentrated liquidity pools. Liquidity providers can choose custom price ranges for their assets instead of spreading them across the entire curve. This means more capital is deployed where trades actually happen, reducing slippage. For example, if you're providing liquidity for ETH/USDC, you can set a range between $1,800 and $2,000, focusing your funds where most activity occurs.

The platform offers five fee tiers: 0.008%, 0.01%, 0.03%, 0.04%, and 1%. Providers pick a tier based on volatility. Stablecoin pairs might use 0.008%, while high-risk tokens could use 1%. This flexibility helps match risk tolerance with potential rewards.

Another key feature is the Reinvestment Curve mechanism. Instead of manually claiming fees, the protocol automatically compounds earnings by reinvesting them into the pool. This saves time and boosts returns-though it requires careful monitoring to avoid impermanent loss.

Pros of KyberSwap Elastic

• Multi-chain support: Unlike single-chain DEXs, KyberSwap Elastic aggregates liquidity across Ethereum, Polygon, BSC, Avalanche, Fantom, Arbitrum, and Optimism. This means better prices and lower slippage for cross-chain swaps.
• Custom fee tiers: The five fee levels let liquidity providers tailor their risk exposure. This is more granular than competitors like Uniswap V3, which only offers four tiers.
• Capital efficiency: Concentrated liquidity means more trading volume per dollar invested. For stablecoins, this can reduce slippage by up to 50% compared to traditional AMMs.

Security Concerns: The 2023 Exploit

Despite its innovations, KyberSwap Elastic's security track record is deeply flawed. In November 2023, attackers exploited a critical flaw in the computeSwapStep() function. CertiK's audit revealed the issue stemmed from incorrect price boundary calculations during cross-tick operations. This led to rounding errors that allowed malicious actors to manipulate liquidity accounting.

The attack was precise: the main exploiter withdrew $48.6 million by using a swap amount of 244,080,034,447,359,999,999. Additional $6.5 million was stolen by mimicked bots. A total of 2,367 liquidity providers lost funds, with overall losses hitting $56.2 million. KyberSwap recovered $5.7 million from front-running bots and $706,000 from locked assets, but this covered less than 12% of total losses.

After the exploit, the platform issued warnings via CoinGecko, urging users to withdraw funds immediately. Community sentiment shifted from praise to fear. Twitter followers dropped from 296,655 to under 150,000. Security experts now question whether the platform's technical complexity makes it inherently vulnerable.

KyberSwap Elastic vs Uniswap V3

Should You Use KyberSwap Elastic in 2026?

As of February 2026, KyberSwap Elastic remains in recovery mode. The platform has implemented emergency protocols and is monitoring for vulnerabilities, but no public details about technical fixes exist. Security audits are ongoing, but results haven't been shared. For most users, the risks outweigh the benefits.

Here's what to consider:

• If you're a liquidity provider, the potential for impermanent loss and security risks makes this platform too dangerous. The Reinvestment Curve feature sounds great but can't compensate for lost funds.
• For traders, multi-chain aggregation is valuable. But with better security alternatives like SushiSwap or Curve Finance, there's little reason to take the risk.
• The platform's Alexa rank (#89563) and monthly pageviews (169k) show declining interest. This isn't a sign of a healthy project.

Until KyberSwap Elastic publishes a full audit report and proves it's fixed its vulnerabilities, it's safer to choose DEXs with proven track records. For Polygon-based trading, consider alternatives like QuickSwap or Trader Joe-they offer similar features without the security baggage.

Frequently Asked Questions